CANDIDATES MORE IN FAVOR OF A TAX INCREASE LIMITATION REQUIREMENT THAN FOR ONE ON FEE INCREASES

Share this Report

Mitch Coffman:  During the 2012 legislative session, House Joint Resolution 1 was introduced, proposing an amendment to the Idaho Constitution requiring that any tax increase or fee increase would need a two-thirds vote of both houses in the Legislature for a tax or fee increase. It received mixed reviews when it was presented in committee, and ultimately didn’t go anywhere.

The resolution said that no bill providing for a net increase in revenue to the state, by fees or taxes, can become law unless two-thirds of both houses approve it.

The resolution was defeated on two grounds of reasoning. First, that it did not provide a clear definition of what constitutes a net increase in revenue and, second, a number of lawmakers were not willing to consider a tax increase and a fee increase in the same resolution. That is, many more favored such a limit on tax increases, but were hesitant when it came to fee increases.

Read More

The Child Tax Credit Provides Tax Relief to All Families with Children 

The Grocery Tax Credit Enhancement in House Bill 231 Helps Idaho Families as Food Prices Increase